Raising Children After AuschwitzIDO ABRAM, 1998 In Germany, a heat debate is going on: which meaning have the
horrors of the holocaust and other deeds of the nazis for us? Auschwitz and our memory of it.There are important reasons for teachers, parents, students and other youths, to intensively think about the holocaust. At first in order to learn about ourselves, the human beings. The holocaust teaches us how bad 'bad' can be, but also that a human may reach a higher level by supporting other humans. Aggression is within each of us. Education may learn us to use that aggression to create instead of delete, to build instead of to break, to change conflict in dialogue. With the notion that some conflicts are not resolvable. Another reason is to caution everybody, but especially the young people, against such kind of things that still happen. Primo Levi, who survived Auschwitz, said:
A third reason is to avoid to share the rows of the brutes and the deniers. About the deniers, Roger Errera, a French judge, said that it was their aim "to delete our memory, the only tomb for the died, and to delete each track of the crime from our memory". AdornoIn 1966, philosopher and sociologist Theodor Adorno wrote a now famous passage in his essay "Raising Children After Auschwitz":
Education after Auschwitz implies two things:
Young people should not only think about other humans and situations, but
must also think about themselves and their own situation. Such thinking and
self-knowledge should bring that mentioned chilliness to consciousness. This
should prevent that the young ones would act out their feelings of hate and
aggression on other people or things. It should stimulate that young people
make their own decisions and choices instead of automatically follow the
majority. We call this autonomy. The horror of Auschwitz is the horror of our world. The meaninglessness of
the horrors of Auschwitz is the meaninglessness of all horrors. Our children
must get the insight that the Auschwitz of then is a part of our
world nowadays. If not, the chance of repeat is greater. Young people has also to put themselves in the place of the offenders of the holocaust. There were three groups or roles involved in the holocaust:
With the bystanders, we have in mind, within the context of the national socialism,
To understand the holocaust, the juvenile has to put himself in the place
of all actors: of the offenders as well of the victims, as well as the
bystanders. Young people has to try to gain insight in the mechanisms and
circumstances which, under national socialism (and other ideologically
motivated murder programs) human beings made - and make nowadays - to
aggressors and murderers. The educational principles of this five-points program are
Young childrenAccording to Adorno, Raising Children After Auschwitz should begin in early childhood. However, he doesn't tell us how to do that.
Having the five-points program given above in mind, we are able to draw up such an outline for raising children between three and ten years of age. Actually, it will be and 'Education after Auschwitz without Auschwitz', an education without detailed and extreme horrors. The first two points remain. The third and the fifth point expire, the fourth point may be shortened. By doing so, we create the next three-points program:
Raising children after Auschwitz implies promoting autonomy: to think
self, to chose and decide self, not to unthinkingly follow the crowd. Raising children after Auschwitz implies promoting empathy with offenders, victims and bystanders. No child is unfamiliar with those three roles. The educational principles of the three-points program for children between three and ten year are the same as the three principles of the five-points program for older children and youths:
To give form to the three-points program, the use of picture books may be a good help. [Abram gives examples of Dutch books which are usable] Professor Dr Ido Abram This article is a re-written version of a lecture held on 29
November 1998
|